Litigating Labour:Condoning Unreasonable Risk Taking in Childbirth?

Heywood, Rob (2015) Litigating Labour:Condoning Unreasonable Risk Taking in Childbirth? Common Law World Review, 44 (1). pp. 28-50. ISSN 1473-7795

[img] Microsoft Word (Litigating Labour Condoning Unreasonable Risk Taking in Childbirth CLWR Submission Minor Revisions Edition) - Submitted Version
Download (557kB)

Abstract

Given the vast quantity of obstetric litigation and all its associated complexities, in 2012 the National Health Service Litigation Authority (NHSLA) produced a report entitled Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data (the 2012 Report). This document identified, inter alia, a number of problematic areas in respect of litigation trends and illuminated a range of clinical situations in which claims are most likely to arise. It is against this backdrop that this paper seeks to critically analyse a body of case law that has occurred since the publication of the 2012 Report. Focusing on breach of duty, the paper seeks to evaluate whether or not the weighing of risks and benefits, as advocated in the case of Bolitho as a means of assessing the question of breach, has been appropriately utilised by judges in recent childbirth cases. It is an important and original piece of research as it is the first of its kind to investigate how judges have dealt with specific aspects of childbirth identified as being contentious in the wake of the 2012 Report.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: clinical negligence,childbirth,breach of duty,bolitho,doctors,midwives
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 27 Jan 2015 10:08
Last Modified: 28 Oct 2020 00:45
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/50896
DOI: 10.1177/1473779514564559

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item