What the Indonesian rattan export ban means for domestic and international markets, forests, and the livelihoods of rattan collectors

Myers, Rodd (2015) What the Indonesian rattan export ban means for domestic and international markets, forests, and the livelihoods of rattan collectors. Forest Policy and Economics, 50. 210–219. ISSN 1389-9341

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Rattan is a vine that grows in tropical forests and is used primarily in the furniture industry. It is a billion-dollar industry involving hundreds of countries but the raw material is overwhelmingly collected from forests. Indonesia is the world's largest supplier of rattan. This article uses a value chain approach to elucidate the market, environmental, and social implications of an Indonesian policy that bans the export of un- and semi-processed rattan, which started on 1 January, 2012. The justification for policy was to reduce competition so that domestic furniture producers would fare better in export markets. A year after the policy took effect, actors benefit differ- ently depending on where they are in the value chain and the nature of their activities. Only the largest and highest-end furniture factories on Java have experienced increased in sales. Forest-adjacent rattan-supplying actors in Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Sumatera are adversely affected. Those engaged in rattan smuggling from Indonesia are receiving the most immediate benefits. Together, these findings show that in the short term, the policy serves elite interests, whose political prowess enabled the policy to pass. In the long term, the industry is at risk of suffocation and the forests are jeopardised.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	value chain ,indonesia,southeast asia ,trade policy ,rattan
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development)
Depositing User:	Pure Connector
Date Deposited:	03 Sep 2014 09:12
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2022 00:07
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/50005
DOI:	10.1016/j.forpol.2014.07.009

Actions (login required)

View Item