Cath, Yuri (2015) Revisionary intellectualism and Gettier. Philosophical Studies, 172 (1). pp. 7-27. ISSN 0031-8116
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
How should intellectualists respond to apparent Gettier-style counterexamples? Stanley (Know how, 2011a, Ch. 8) offers an orthodox response which rejects the claim that the subjects in such scenarios possess knowledge-how. I argue that intellectualists should embrace a revisionary response according to which knowledge-how is a distinctively practical species of knowledge-that that is compatible with Gettier-style luck.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | knowledge-how ,knowledge-that,intentional action,luck |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Philosophy (former - to 2014) |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy of Mathematics and Economics (former - to 2017) Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2014 13:32 |
Last Modified: | 21 Jul 2023 09:36 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/48306 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11098-013-0263-y |
Actions (login required)
View Item |