Schroeder, J., Dugdale, H. L., Radersma, R., Hinsch, M., Buehler, D. M., Saul, J., Porter, L., Liker, A., De Cauwer, I., Johnson, P. J., Santure, A. W., Griffin, A. S., Bolund, E., Ross, L., Webb, T. J., Feulner, P. G. D., Winney, I., Szulkin, M., Komdeur, J., Versteegh, M. A., Hemelrijk, C. K., Svensson, E. I., Edwards, H., Karlsson, M., West, S. A., Barrett, E. L. B., Richardson, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-9074, Van Den Brink, V., Wimpenny, J. H., Ellwood, S. A., Rees, M., Matson, K. D., Charmantier, A., Dos Remedios, N., Schneider, N. A., Teplitsky, C., Laurance, W. F., Butlin, R. K. and Horrocks, N. P. C. (2013) Fewer invited talks by women in evolutionary biology symposia. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26 (9). pp. 2063-2069. ISSN 1010-061X
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Lower visibility of female scientists, compared to male scientists, is a potential reason for the under-representation of women among senior academic ranks. Visibility in the scientific community stems partly from presenting research as an invited speaker at organized meetings. We analysed the sex ratio of presenters at the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB) Congress 2011, where all abstract submissions were accepted for presentation. Women were under-represented among invited speakers at symposia (15% women) compared to all presenters (46%), regular oral presenters (41%) and plenary speakers (25%). At the ESEB congresses in 2001–2011, 9–23% of invited speakers were women. This under-representation of women is partly attributable to a larger proportion of women, than men, declining invitations: in 2011, 50% of women declined an invitation to speak compared to 26% of men. We expect invited speakers to be scientists from top ranked institutions or authors of recent papers in high-impact journals. Considering all invited speakers (including declined invitations), 23% were women. This was lower than the baseline sex ratios of early-mid career stage scientists, but was similar to senior scientists and authors that have published in high-impact journals. High-quality science by women therefore has low exposure at international meetings, which will constrain Evolutionary Biology from reaching its full potential. We wish to highlight the wider implications of turning down invitations to speak, and encourage conference organizers to implement steps to increase acceptance rates of invited talks.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | career ladder progression,conference presenters,discrimination,evolutionary biology,gender difference,implicit bias,invited speakers,leaky pipeline,scientific visibility,sex ratios |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Science > School of Biological Sciences |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Science > Research Centres > Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Conservation Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Organisms and the Environment |
Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2013 15:30 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2023 17:31 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/44378 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jeb.12198 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |