Improving the quality of development research:What could archiving qualitative data for reanalysis and revisiting research sites contribute?

Camfield, Laura and Palmer-Jones, Richard (2013) Improving the quality of development research:What could archiving qualitative data for reanalysis and revisiting research sites contribute? Progress in Development Studies, 13 (4). pp. 323-338. ISSN 1464-9934

[img]
Preview
PDF (Camfield and Palmer-Jones 2013_article) - Published Version
Download (559kB) | Preview

Abstract

As the emphasis on evidence-based policymaking in international development increases, so too should the attention paid to the quality of the research on which this evidence is based. One way to encourage this is by archiving research data to enable reanalysis, but this requirement is often ignored or resisted by development researchers. Similarly, ambivalent feelings are expressed about revisits to former research sites to conduct further research by original and other researchers. In this article, we outline why and how researchers archive and reanalyze qualitative data and revisit research sites, and discuss the potential benefits and challenges of these practices for development research.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of International Development
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Oct 2013 17:36
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2020 23:50
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/43883
DOI: 10.1177/1464993413490481

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item