Hamilton, Michael (2015) The Misrule of Law? ‘Terrorist speech’, Human Rights and the Legal Construction of Risk. In: Terrorism and the Rule of Law. HVG-ORAC Books, Budapest, pp. 151-171.
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Freedom of expression is the obvious, but not the only casualty of laws against so-called ‘terrorist speech’. Borrowing from Dworkin’s analysis of laws criminalizing hate-speech, it can be argued that the rule of law itself is undermined when it imposes liability for speech which ‘glorifies’ terrorism – speech that falls far short of advocacy of imminent violent action. Formalistic understandings of the rule of law are prone to co-opt human rights (in part, because of the state centricity of rights-based obligations), and thus yield a shortfall in speech protection in the face of perceived ‘terrorist’ threats. Yet, the rule of law conceived differently – retaining as a central element an ideal of democratic participation and self-governance – exerts a stronger pull against such precautionary restrictions on freedom of speech.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 16 - peace, justice and strong institutions ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Media, Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > International Law |
Depositing User: | Michael Hamilton |
Date Deposited: | 28 Feb 2013 11:07 |
Last Modified: | 30 Sep 2021 16:54 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/41755 |
DOI: |
Actions (login required)
View Item |