The place of 'think family' approaches in child and family social work; messages from a process evaluation of an English 'pathfinder' service

Thoburn, June, Cooper, Neil, Brandon, Marian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1654-1819 and Connolly, Sara ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6714-3493 (2013) The place of 'think family' approaches in child and family social work; messages from a process evaluation of an English 'pathfinder' service. Children and Youth Services Review, 35 (2). pp. 228-236.

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Findings are reported from a process study of an English multi-disciplinary team working with families with long standing and complex problems. The approaches and methods of the team are described and placed in the context of UK policy developments and of UK and USA research on professional practice with families facing multiple difficulties. Basic data are provided on all families referred in the first year and analysed with respect to the first 100 completed cases. A broadly ethnographic research approach is used for the observational study of the team interactions and decision-making on individual cases. For a one-third sub-sample of 33 cases, process and interim outcome data are analysed from information systematically extracted from case records. These are complemented by qualitative data from interviews with managers and caseworkers and by observation of ‘team around the family’ and professionals' meetings. The researchers conclude that the service succeeds in engaging a majority of the referred families who have been hard to reach or hard to change in the past and whose children are either ‘on the edge of care’ or likely to be significantly harmed without the provision of an intensive service. The researchers concluded that improvements were made in the life chances of children in 75% of the families. Aspects of the service identified as associated with more positive outcomes are: the allocation of two key workers (one for the child/ren and one for the parent/s); the centrality of relationship-based practice and flexibility of the approach rather than strict adherence to any particular practice model; the fact that the service is firmly embedded within the statutory children's services department, allowing for continuity of relationships with team around the family members when the intensive service ends; and flexibility about case duration and intensity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: child protection,intensive-outreach,multi-disciplinary,multi-problem families,relationships,social work methods
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Social Work
Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Research on Children and Families
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Employment Systems and Institutions
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Social Cognition Research Group
Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Child Protection & Family Support
Depositing User: Julie Frith
Date Deposited: 26 Feb 2013 10:55
Last Modified: 24 Sep 2024 08:50
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/41578
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.009

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item