Clist, Paul ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-9446 (2011) 25 years of aid allocation practice: Whither selectivity? World Development, 39 (10). pp. 1724-1734.
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
The 4P framework (Poverty, Population, Policy, and Proximity) is introduced as a way of understanding a donor’s aid allocation. We use the two-part model and examine the period 1982–2006. The results indicate that recent conclusions of increasing selectivity are misplaced for the seven major donors analyzed, who together represent the majority of development aid. Indeed, the effect of each of the commonly mentioned time-trends (selectivity, the end of the Cold War, and the commencement of the Global War on Terror) is much smaller than the role of donor heterogeneity, which appears sizeable and entrenched.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 1 - no poverty ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/no_poverty |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development) |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Experimental Economics (former - to 2017) Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Impact Evaluation Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural and Experimental Development Economics |
Depositing User: | Julie Frith |
Date Deposited: | 05 Dec 2012 10:08 |
Last Modified: | 15 Jun 2023 23:38 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/40376 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.04.031 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |