Tools
Tools
Duvendack, Maren 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8125-9115, Hombrados, Jorge Garcia, Palmer-Jones, Richard and Waddington, Hugh
(2012)
Assessing 'what works' in international development: Meta-analysis for sophisticated dummies.
Journal of Development Effectiveness, 4 (3).
pp. 456-471.
ISSN 1943-9407
Abstract
Many studies of development interventions are individually unable to provide convincing conclusions because of low statistical significance, small size, limited geographical purview and so forth. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are forms of research synthesis that combine studies of adequate methodological quality to produce more convincing conclusions. In the social sciences, study designs, types of analysis and methodological quality vary tremendously. Combining these studies for meta-analysis entails more demanding risk of bias assessments to ensure that only studies with largely appropriate methodological characteristics are included, and sensitivity analysis should be performed. In this article, we discuss assessing risk of bias and meta-analysis using such diverse studies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development) |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Gender and Development Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Impact Evaluation |
| Depositing User: | Julie Frith |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Nov 2012 09:35 |
| Last Modified: | 09 Apr 2024 10:30 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/40133 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/19439342.2012.710642 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |