McCreesh, Nicky, Frost, Simon D. W., Seeley, Janet, Katongole, Joseph, Tarsh, Matilda N., Ndunguse, Richard, Jichi, Fatima, Lunel, Natasha L., Maher, Dermot, Johnston, Lisa G., Sonnenberg, Pam, Copas, Andrew J., Hayes, Richard J. and White, Richard G. (2012) Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling. Epidemiology, 23 (1). pp. 138-147. ISSN 1044-3983
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Respondent-driven sampling produced a generally representative sample of this well-connected nonhidden population. However, current respondent-driven sampling inference methods failed to reduce bias when it occurred. Whether the data required to remove bias and measure precision can be collected in a respondent-driven sampling survey is unresolved. Respondent-driven sampling should be regarded as a (potentially superior) form of convenience sampling method, and caution is required when interpreting findings based on the sampling method.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development) |
Depositing User: | Janet Seeley |
Date Deposited: | 22 Mar 2012 15:17 |
Last Modified: | 02 Feb 2024 01:36 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/38454 |
DOI: | 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31823ac17c |
Actions (login required)
View Item |