Hviid, Morten and Shaffer, Greg (1999) Hassle costs: The Achilles' heel of price-matching guarantees. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 8 (4). pp. 489-521. ISSN 1530-9134
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
We show that price-matching guarantees can facilitate monopoly pricing only if firms automatically match prices. If consumers must instead request refunds (thereby incurring hassle costs), we find that any increase in equilibrium prices due to firms' price-matching policies will be small; often, no price increase can be supported. In symmetric markets price-matching guarantees cannot support any rise in prices, even if hassle costs are arbitrarily small. In asymmetric markets, higher prices can be supported, but the prices fall well short of maximizing joint profits. Our model can explain why some firms adopt price-matching guarantees while others do not.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law |
UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Competition, Markets and Regulation Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Business and Local Government Data Research Centre (former - to 2023) Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Media, Information Technology and Intellectual Property Law Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy |
Depositing User: | Nicola Secker |
Date Deposited: | 01 Apr 2011 07:57 |
Last Modified: | 22 Apr 2023 23:52 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/27844 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1430-9134.1999.00489.x |
Actions (login required)
View Item |