Neurobiological measurements of cardinal utility: Hedonimeters or learning algorithms?

Zizzo, Daniel John (2002) Neurobiological measurements of cardinal utility: Hedonimeters or learning algorithms? Social Choice and Welfare, 19 (3). pp. 477-488. ISSN 1432-217X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

A neurobiological argument has been used to defend the measurability and interpersonal comparability of cardinal utility. If true, a strong case could be made for the practical relevance of utility-based social welfare functions. In this paper I demonstrate that the current evidence does not corroborate the cardinal measurability and comparability of utility. Electrical stimulation of brain parts, or asymmetries in brain hemispherical activation, cannot be used to build a hedonimeter. The role of the neurotransmitter dopamine is that of a saliency detector or alternatively one validating adaptive learning models, but either way is not that of a general cardinal utility measure.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics
Depositing User:	Vishal Gautam
Date Deposited:	01 Jul 2002
Last Modified:	11 Jan 2024 01:24
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/16694
DOI:	10.1007/s003550100122

Actions (login required)

View Item