Palmer-Jones, Richard (2003) Agricultural growth, poverty reduction and agro-ecological zones in India: an ecological fallacy? Food Policy, 28 (5-6). pp. 423-431. ISSN 0306-9192
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
In an article in this journal that is part of an oevre that has been widely cited Shenggen Fan, Peter Hazel and T. Haque (2000a) present evidence that government investments in India now have greater effects on poverty in rainfed than irrigated regions. This note suggests that parts of the methodology on which this claim is based are unclear and possibly suffer from an ecological fallacy. Even after clarification of their method by the authors, some doubts remain as to whether the results quoted support the original claim.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 1 - no poverty ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/no_poverty |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development) |
Depositing User: | Vishal Gautam |
Date Deposited: | 01 Dec 2003 |
Last Modified: | 08 Mar 2023 12:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/16636 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0306-9192(03)00049-6 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |