Specialist epilepsy nurses for treating epilepsy

Bradley, Peter M. and Lindsay, Bruce (2001) Specialist epilepsy nurses for treating epilepsy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4. ISSN 1465-1858

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Epilepsy is a common serious neurological condition with a 0.5% prevalence. As a result of the perceived deficiencies and suggestions to improve the quality of care offered to people with epilepsy, two models of service provision have been suggested by researchers: specialist epilepsy out‐patient clinics (as opposed to the management of patients in general neurology clinics or general medical clinics) and nurse‐based liaison services between primary (GP) and secondary/tertiary (hospital‐based) care. Objectives: To overview the evidence from controlled trials investigating the effectiveness of specialist epilepsy nurses compared to routine care. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004), MEDLINE (October 2004), GEARS, EMBASE, ECRI, Effectiveness Healthcare Bulletin, Effectiveness Matters, Bandolier, Evidence Based Purchasing, National Research Register and PsycINFO databases. Selection criteria: Randomized controlled and quasi‐randomized trials which considered specialist epilepsy nurse interventions with standard or alternative care were included in this review. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion and extracted data. Outcomes investigated included: seizure frequency; appropriateness of medication prescribed; social or psychological functioning scores; knowledge about epilepsy scores; costs of care and adverse effects. Main results: Three trials were included, two based in general practice and one in a neurology centre. The population of patients differed between trials, for example one study excluded patients with learning disabilities, and one only recruited patients with a new diagnosis. In view of this heterogeneity we decided not to pool results in a meta‐analysis. As yet, there is no convincing evidence that specialist epilepsy nurses improve outcomes for people with epilepsy overall. Important outcomes (eg seizure frequency, psychosocial functioning, knowledge of epilepsy, general health status, work days lost, depression and anxiety scores) show no significant improvement. There is some evidence that people who have not had an epileptic seizure in the last six months are less at risk for depression. There is also evidence that newly diagnosed patients whose knowledge about epilepsy is poor may improve their epilepsy knowledge scores after nurse intervention. Authors' conclusions: It is clearly plausible that specialist epilepsy nurses could improve quality in epilepsy care. However, there is as yet little evidence to support this assumption as the present research base is small. Further research is needed to investigate the effectiveness of specialist epilepsy nurses before such recommendations can be made.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Nursing and Midwifery (former - to 2011)
Depositing User:	EPrints Services
Date Deposited:	25 Nov 2010 11:09
Last Modified:	16 Jul 2024 13:30
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/12243
DOI:	10.1002/14651858.CD001907

Actions (login required)

View Item