Siems, Mathias (2008) Legal Originality. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 28 (1). 147–164. ISSN 0143-6503
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
In legal academia it is highly controversial how to ‘be original’ in legal research. This article will try to maintain an attitude of tolerance in not promoting or discrediting one particular methodology. Instead, it will identify four different ways of ‘being original’. Perhaps the most common approach is to deal with ‘micro-legal questions’. Many legal academics also pursue research in ‘macro-legal questions’. Less common but growing is the importance of ‘scientific legal research’ and research in ‘non-legal topics’.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Depositing User: | Julia Sheldrake |
Date Deposited: | 12 Nov 2010 10:08 |
Last Modified: | 11 Jan 2023 17:32 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/10824 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ojls/gqm024 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |