Pattenden, Rosemary (2008) Pre-verdict judicial fact-finding in criminal trials with juries. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29 (1). pp. 1-24. ISSN 0143-6503
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
In criminal trials with a jury, judges have many opportunities to engage in adjudicative fact-finding before the jury retires. English law has no conceptual framework for examining this judicial fact-finding which encompasses two categories of collateral fact (preliminary and underlying fact) and foreign law. A third category of collateral fact (conditional fact) is decided by the jury. The article examines the nature of judicial fact-finding and the history and rationale for this allocation of fact-finding responsibility between judge and jury.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | sdg 16 - peace, justice and strong institutions ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/peace_justice_and_strong_institutions |
Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law |
Depositing User: | Julia Sheldrake |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2010 16:56 |
Last Modified: | 26 Jan 2023 11:30 |
URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/10781 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ojls/gqn028 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |