A randomized controlled trial testing a digital intervention to promote weight loss and weight loss maintenance.

Kwasnicka, Dominika, Palacz-Poborczyk, Iga, Verboon, Peter, Luszczynska, Aleksandra, Quested, Eleanor, Robinson, Suzanne, Gao, Lan, Januszewicz, Anna, Hagger, Martin S., Pagoto, Sherry, Idziak, Paulina and Naughton, Felix (2026) A randomized controlled trial testing a digital intervention to promote weight loss and weight loss maintenance. Health Psychology. ISSN 0278-6133

[thumbnail of Choosing Health Authors Info Accepted Changes] Microsoft Word (OpenXML) (Choosing Health Authors Info Accepted Changes) - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (941kB)

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Choosing Health program, which tailors support to an individual’s weight loss and weight loss maintenance determinants among adults with overweight and obesity. Method: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with a nested interrupted time series within-person design. Participants (N = 288) were randomized to the Choosing Health digital intervention (n = 145) or a control group (n = 143). Intervention participants completed 90 days of Ecological Momentary Assessments, which were used to identify behavioral determinants to tailor an intervention. Control participants received nontailored weight loss advice via generic emails and eBook. Body weight (the primary outcome), blood pressure, and % body fat (secondary outcomes) measured at 3, 6 and 12 months were restructured into change of baseline scores and analyzed using multilevel regression analysis, with the three time points nested within subjects. Results: Findings revealed no significant difference in mean weight loss between groups at 6 months, controlled for baseline (primary outcome; mean difference = 0.78 kg), F(1, 175) = 1.44, p = .232. Intervention participants had higher weight loss at 12 months than control participants (mean difference = 2.05 kg), F(1, 108) = 2.96, p = .088); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The results showed promising trends for the intervention group in weight loss maintenance measured at 12 months. The dropout rate was higher than expected, as the intervention was delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic making face-to-face assessments difficult. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: behaviour maintenance,behavioural theory,weight loss,digital health,within-person design
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Public Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural and Implementation Science
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Promotion
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 01 May 2026 11:05
Last Modified: 01 May 2026 11:05
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/102876
DOI: 10.1037/hea0001607

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item