Detectable global temperature responses to wildfires and volcanic eruptions

Li, Yaowei, Santer, Benjamin D., Solomon, Susan, Thompson, David W. J. and Fu, Qiang (2026) Detectable global temperature responses to wildfires and volcanic eruptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 123 (10). ISSN 0027-8424

Microsoft Word (rba08-Santer_etal_Detectable_gl) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (2MB)

Abstract

Large volcanic eruptions and intense wildfires perturb Earth’s atmospheric temperature. Understanding the climate response to such natural forcings is essential for obtaining reliable estimates of its response to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. While the climate impacts of volcanic sulfate aerosols are well documented, other natural forcings—including wildfire smoke reaching the stratosphere and water vapor injections from a submarine eruption—pose new challenges for detecting and attributing their atmospheric temperature impacts. Here, we demonstrate robust detection of statistically significant temperature anomalies in the troposphere and stratosphere using multidecadal satellite observations and internal variability estimates from a climate model ensemble and from observations. We analyze three landmark events: the 1991 Pinatubo eruption, the 2019-2020 Australian wildfires, and the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption. Each leaves a fingerprint with distinct altitudinal, geographical, and temporal structure. The global-mean stratospheric signal from Australian wildfires is detectable even in time averages extending beyond 10 mo, despite injecting only ~5% of Pinatubo’s aerosol mass. For Hunga Tonga, we detect significant and prolonged stratospheric cooling, but no robust tropospheric signal in the first 2 y. These findings show that both sulfate and nonsulfate stratospheric perturbations produce distinct, statistically identifiable global temperature signals. Accounting for such forcings in climate model simulations is therefore essential for improving comparisons of simulated and observed variability.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Data, Materials, and Software Availability: All of the observational satellite temperature data (MSU and SSU) used in this study are publicly available at Remote Sensing Systems (https://www.remss.com/measurements/brightnesstemperature/) (70), the University of Alabama at Huntsville (https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0/) (71), and the Center for Satellite Applications and Research (https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/smcd/emb/mscat/products.php) (72). The processed observational satellite temperature data and synthetic satellite temperature data from CMIP6 simulation output are available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16899833) (73). The code used to generate all the main figures in this analysis is available at Zenodo (https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16899833) (73).
Uncontrolled Keywords:	atmospheric temperature,climate forcing,satellite and model data,volcanic eruptions,wildfires |,general,sdg 13 - climate action ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1000
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Climatic Research Unit Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?...
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	20 Mar 2026 16:30
Last Modified:	23 Mar 2026 01:21
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/102526
DOI:	10.1073/pnas.2525500123

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item