Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems

Garrett, Rachael, Meyfroidt, Patrick, de Bremond, Ariane, Wartenberg, Ariani, Barbieri, Lindsay, Fernández-Llamazares, Álvaro, Acheampong, Emmanuel, Addoah, Thomas, Adeleye, Matthew, Alexander, Peter, Brandão, Joyce, Coomes, David Anthony, Ellis, Erle C., Fajardo, J., Jacobi, Johanna, Leach, Melissa, Lele, Sharachchandra, Zonta, Aymara Llanque, Lyons-White, Joss, Martin, Adrian, Messerli, Peter, Milner-Gulland, E. J., Müller, Daniel, Mills, Morena, Kalunda, Pauline Nantongo, Pascual, Unai, Rueda, Ximena, Ryan, Casey, Setty, Siddappa, Pham, Thu Thuy and Zagaria, Cecilia (2025) Policy principles for sustainable and just land systems. Royal Society Open Science, 12 (10). ISSN 2054-5703

[thumbnail of garrett-et-al-2025-policy-principles-for-sustainable-and-just-land-systems]
Preview
PDF (garrett-et-al-2025-policy-principles-for-sustainable-and-just-land-systems) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (887kB) | Preview

Abstract

Land systems are the nexus of many global sustainability and justice challenges. Here we present eight guiding principles (P1–8) for improved land system policies following the heuristic stages of a policy cycle. The principles are as follows: embrace recognitional justice (P1), be politically strategic (P2), consider multiple policy goals (P3), address systemic issues (P4), take an integrative scope (P5), foster co-development (P6), adopt clear and monitorable targets (P7) and integrate diagnostic and adaptive capacities (P8). We then explore how well policies align with these principles in two globally relevant cases (land-based climate mitigation and biodiversity-friendly agriculture). In both cases, we find that when policies align poorly with the principles at the agenda-setting stage, there is further misalignment at the policy formulation stage. In the instances when recognitional justice is embraced at the onset, policies subsequently integrate more diverse goals and co-development, but they insufficiently consider political strategy and struggle to handle system complexity. Nonetheless, we identify promising policy mixes that provide benefits to multiple actors, integrate multiple goals, take an integrative scope and have strong monitoring and adaptation, aligning well with multiple principles. Further investigation of these principles could reveal promising policy pathways for land systems.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Data accessibility: Supplementary material is available online: Garrett R et al.. 2025 Supplementary material from: Policy roadmap for sustainable and just land systems. Figshare. (doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.8047775).
Uncontrolled Keywords: governance,science–policy,sustainability transitions,conservation,climate,food,transformation,sdg 13 - climate action,sdg 15 - life on land ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/climate_action
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Global Development (formerly School of International Development)
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2025 09:31
Last Modified: 24 Oct 2025 08:31
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/100743
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.250810

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item