The hidden perils of affirmative action: Sabotage in handicap contests

Brown, Alasdair and M. Chowdhury, Subhasish (2017) The hidden perils of affirmative action: Sabotage in handicap contests. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133. 273–284. ISSN 0167-2681

[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (612kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Contests are ubiquitous in economic, organizational and political settings. Contest designers often use tools to make a contest among asymmetric contestants more even, in order to either elicit higher effort levels, or for ethical reasons. Handicapping – in which stronger participants are a priori weakened – is one successful tool that is widely used in sports, promotional tournaments and procurement auctions. In this study we show theoretically that participants may also increase their destructive effort, and sabotage their rivals’ performance, when handicapping is employed. We empirically verify this prediction using data on 19,635 U.K. horse-races in 2011 and 2012. Our results suggest that while a level field may be conducive to heightened positive effort in general, in a setting where both handicapping and sabotage are present it also lays the ground for greater destruction.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: sabotage,contests,contest design,superstars,handicapping,horse racing
    Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics
    Depositing User: Pure Connector
    Date Deposited: 14 Nov 2016 16:00
    Last Modified: 09 Apr 2019 11:41
    URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/61326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.11.009

    Actions (login required)

    View Item