Judgment aggregation in search for the truth

Bozbay, İrem, Dietrich, Franz and Peters, Hans (2014) Judgment aggregation in search for the truth. Games and Economic Behavior, 87. pp. 571-590. ISSN 0899-8256

PDF (1-s2.0-S0899825614000384-main) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (500kB) | Preview


    We analyze the problem of aggregating judgments over multiple issues from the perspective of whether aggregate judgments manage to efficiently use all voters' private information. While new in judgment aggregation theory, this perspective is familiar in a different body of literature about voting between two alternatives where voters' disagreements stem from conflicts of information rather than of interest. Combining the two bodies of literature, we consider a simple judgment aggregation problem and model the private information underlying voters' judgments. Assuming that voters share a preference for true collective judgments, we analyze the resulting strategic incentives and determine which voting rules efficiently use all private information. We find that in certain, but not all cases a quota rule should be used, which decides on each issue according to whether the proportion of ‘yes’ votes exceeds a particular quota.

    Item Type: Article
    Uncontrolled Keywords: judgment aggregation,private information,efficient information aggregation,strategic voting
    Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics
    Depositing User: Pure Connector
    Date Deposited: 05 Feb 2016 13:01
    Last Modified: 21 Mar 2019 11:23
    URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/56966
    DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2014.02.007

    Actions (login required)

    View Item