Tools
ToolsSugden, R. (2005) Anomalies and stated preference techniques:A framework for a discussion of coping strategies. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32 (1). pp. 1-12. ISSN 0924-6460
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
This paper introduces a symposium on the issue of how stated preference (SP) research can best cope with 'anomalies' (i.e. systematic deviations from the predictions of standard economic theory) in survey responses. It proposes a framework for constructive debate, recognising (i) the legitimate aspirations of SP research, (ii) the relevance of evidence from sources other than best-practice SP, and (iii) the precautionary value of investigating strategies for coping with suspected anomalies, even if questions about the robustness of anomalies have not been finally resolved. Five alternative coping strategies, discussed in more detail in the symposium, are briefly introduced.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | stated preference,contingent valuation,anomalies |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Economics |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Economic Theory Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Centres > Centre for Competition Policy Faculty of Social Sciences > Research Groups > Behavioural Economics |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2013 16:15 |
| Last Modified: | 18 Apr 2023 23:43 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/44518 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10640-005-6025-3 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |