Tools
Tools
High, Juliet 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2555-2349, Grant, Kelly, Hope, Aimie, Shepstone, Lee, West, Claire ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7649-9600, Colles, Antony and Naughton, Felix
(2024)
Effects of an increased financial incentive on follow-up in an online, automated smoking cessation trial: A randomised controlled Study Within a Trial (SWAT).
Nicotine and Tobacco Research.
ISSN 1462-2203
Preview |
PDF (Naughton et al (2024) Quit Sense SWAT accepted)
- Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (532kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Introduction: Poor retention in clinical trials can impact on statistical power, reliability, validity and generalisability of findings and is a particular challenge in smoking cessation studies. In online trials with automated follow up mechanisms, poor response also increases resource-need for manual follow up. This study compared two financial incentives on response rates at 6 months follow up, in an online, automated smoking cessation feasibility trial of a cessation smartphone app (Quit Sense). Methods: A study within a trial (SWAT), embedded within a host randomised controlled trial. Host trial participants were randomised 1:1 to receive either a £10 or £20 voucher incentive, for completing the 6-month questionnaire. Stratification for randomisation to the SWAT was by minimisation to ensure an even split of host trial arm participants, and by 6-week response rate. Outcome measures were: questionnaire completion rate, time to completion, number of completers requiring manual follow up and completeness of responses. Results: 204 participants were randomised to the SWAT. The £20 and £10 incentives did not differ in completion rate at 6 months (79% versus 74%; p=0.362) but did reduce the proportion of participants requiring manual follow up (46% versus 62%; p=0.018) and the median completion time (7 days versus 15 days; p=0.008). Measure response completeness rates were higher among £20 incentive participants, though differences were small for the host trial's primary smoking outcome. Conclusions: Benefits to using relatively modest increases in incentive for online smoking cessation trials include more rapid completion of follow up questionnaires and reduced manual follow up. Implications: A modest increase in incentive (from £10 to £20) to promote the completion of follow up questionnaires in online smoking cessation trials may not increase overall response rates but could lead to more rapid data collection, a reduced need for manual follow-up and reduced missing data among those who initiate completing a questionnaire. Such an improvement may help to reduce bias, increase validity and generalisability, and improve statistical power in smoking cessation trials.
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |