Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care: A randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness (SupportBack 2)

Geraghty, Adam, Becque, Taeko, Roberts, Lisa C., Hill, Jonathan C., Foster, Nadine E., Yardley, Lucy, Turner, David ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1689-4147, Stuart, Beth, Hay, Elaine M., Griffiths, Gareth, Webley, Frances, Durcan, Lorraine, Morgan, Alannah, Hughes, Stephanie, Bathers, Sarah, Butler-Walley, Stephanie, Wathall, Simon, Mansell, Gemma, White, Malcolm F., Davies, Firoza and Little, Paul (2024) Supporting self-management of low back pain with an internet intervention with and without telephone support in primary care: A randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost-effectiveness (SupportBack 2). The Lancet Rheumatology. ISSN 2665-9913 (In Press)

[thumbnail of SupportBack_2_Main_RCT_paper_3rd_Rev_Clean] PDF (SupportBack_2_Main_RCT_paper_3rd_Rev_Clean) - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099.

Request a copy

Abstract

Background Low back pain (LBP) is prevalent and a leading cause of disability. We aimed to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an accessible, scalable internet intervention for supporting behavioural self-management (SupportBack). Methods Participants in UK primary care with LBP without serious spinal pathology were block randomised using computer algorithms stratified by disability level and telephone-support centre to: 1) usual care, 2) usual care + SupportBack, 3) usual care + SupportBack + physiotherapist telephone-support (three brief calls). Primary outcome: LBP-related disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) at six weeks, three months, six months and 12 months using a repeated measures model, analysed by intention to treat using 97.5% Confidence Intervals (CIs). A parallel economic evaluation from a health services perspective was used to estimate cost-effectiveness. People with lived experience of LBP were involved in this trial and its reporting from the outset. Trial registration: ISRCTN14736486 Findings 825 participants were randomised (274 usual care, 275 SupportBack only, 276 SupportBack + telephone-support). Over half (58%) were female and 42% were male. Follow-up rates were 83% at 6 weeks, 72% at 3 months, 70% at 6 months, and 79% at 12 months. For the primary analysis, 736 participants were analysed (respectively 249, 245, 242). Small reductions in RMDQ over 12 months compared to usual care occurred in the SupportBack group (adjusted mean difference -0.5, 97.5% CI -1.2 to 0.2, p=0.085) and SupportBack + telephone-support group (-0.6, 97.5% CI -1.2 to 0.1, p=0.048). These differences were not significant at a significance level of 0.025. There were no related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). The economic evaluation showed that the SupportBack group dominated usual care, being both more effective and less costly. Both interventions were likely to be cost-effective at a QALY threshold of £20,000 compared to usual care. Interpretation The internet interventions did not significantly reduce LBP-related disability across 12 months compared to usual care. They were likely cost-effective and safe. Clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and safety should be considered together when determining whether to apply these interventions in clinical practice. Funding This trial was funded by the NIHR HTA Programme (project 16/111/78).

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Economics
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2024 12:31
Last Modified: 21 Mar 2024 12:32
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/94735
DOI:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item