Perspective: Peer evaluation of recommendations for CONSORT guidelines for randomized controlled trials in nutrition

Weaver, Connie, Ahles, Sanne, Murphy, Karen J., Shyam, Sangeetha, Cade, Janet, Plat, Jogchum, Schwingshackl, Lukas, Roche, Helen M., Lachat, Carl, Minihane, Anne-Marie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9042-4226 and Rigutto-Farebrother, Jessica and Federation of Nutritional Sciences (FENS) Working Groups on Improving Standards in the Science of Nutrition (2024) Perspective: Peer evaluation of recommendations for CONSORT guidelines for randomized controlled trials in nutrition. Advances in Nutrition, 15 (1). ISSN 2161-8313

[thumbnail of Weaver_etal_2024_AdvNutrition]
Preview
PDF (Weaver_etal_2024_AdvNutrition) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (698kB) | Preview

Abstract

Creating effective dietary guidance requires a rigorous evidence base that is predominantly developed from robust clinical trials or large-scale cohort studies, with the quality of the data available depending on the completeness and accuracy of their reporting. An international group of academics from 14 institutions in 12 different countries and on 5 continents, working on behalf of the Federation of European Nutrition Societies within its “Improving Standards in the Science of Nutrition” initiative, reviewed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement checklist as it pertains to nutrition trials. This perspective piece documents the procedure followed to gain input and consensus on the checklist previously published by this group, including its presentation and interrogation at the International Union of Nutritional Sciences International Congress of Nutrition 2022 (IUNS-ICN 22), inputs from a survey of journal editors, and its piloting on 8 nutrition trials of diverse designs. Overall, the initiative has been met with considerable enthusiasm. At IUNS-ICN 22, refinements to our proposal were elicited through a World Café method discussion with participating nutrition scientists. The contributing journal editors provided valuable insights, and the discussion led to the development of a potential tool specific to assess adherence to the proposed nutrition extension checklist. The piloting of the proposed checklist provided evidence from real-life studies that reporting of nutrition trials can be improved. This initiative aims to stimulate further discussion and development of a CONSORT-nutrition-specific extension.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: consort,dietary interventions,expert opinion,guidelines,nutrition trials,reporting,food science,medicine (miscellaneous),nutrition and dietetics ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1100/1106
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Norwich Institute for Healthy Aging
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Nutrition and Preventive Medicine
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2023 02:19
Last Modified: 03 Jan 2024 03:17
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/93737
DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100154

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item