Why medicine still needs a scientific foundation: Restating the hypotheticodeductive model - Part one

Tools

Hopayian, Kevork ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3037-7242 (2004) Why medicine still needs a scientific foundation: Restating the hypotheticodeductive model - Part one. British Journal of General Practice, 54 (502). pp. 400-401. ISSN 0960-1643

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

• Medical science stands accused of providing an incomplete understanding of health because it is supposedly founded on linearity, reductionism, and positivism. • These criticisms misrepresent the scientific method. • The alternatives offered by complexity theory, postmodernism, and qualitative research risk falling into the traps that the scientific method avoids. • The hypotheticodeductive model of science provides both a coherent description of the growth of scientific knowledge and a prescription for the conduct of good science.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	family practice ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2714
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:	http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?... https://bjgp.org/content/54/502/402
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	11 Aug 2023 09:31
Last Modified:	11 Aug 2023 10:31
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/92839
DOI:

Actions (login required)

View Item