Patient reported outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: The significance of outcome score prediction

Al-Dadah, Oday, Shepstone, Lee and Donell, Simon T (2022) Patient reported outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: The significance of outcome score prediction. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10 (30). pp. 10939-10955. ISSN 2307-8960

[thumbnail of WJCC-10-10939]
Preview
PDF (WJCC-10-10939) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND Numerous anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) clinical outcome measures exist. However, the result of one score does not equate to the findings of another even when evaluating the same patient group. AIM To investigate if statistically derived formulae can be used to predict the outcome of one knee scoring system when the result of another is known in patients with ACL rupture before and after reconstruction. METHODS Fifty patients with ACL rupture were evaluated using nine clinical outcome measures. These included Tegner Activity Score, Lysholm Knee Score, Cincinnati Knee Score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Knee Score, Tapper and Hoover Meniscal Grading Score, IKDC Subjective Knee Score, Knee Outcome Survey - Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS), Short Form-12 Item Health Survey and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Thirty-four patients underwent an ACL reconstruction and were reassessed post-operatively. RESULTS The mean total of each of the nine outcome scores appreciably differed from each other. Significant correlations and regressions were found between most of the outcome scores and were stronger post-operatively. The strongest correlation was found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). The strongest regression formula was also found between Cincinnati and KOS-ADLS (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The formulae produced from this study can be used to predict the outcome of one knee score when the results of the other are known. These formulae could facilitate the conduct of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in studies relating to ACL injuries by allowing the pooling of substantially more data. Al-Dadah O, Shepstone L, Donell ST. Patient reported outcome measures in anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: The significance of outcome score prediction. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(30): 10939-10955 [PMID: 36338237 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10939]

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament,correlation,patient reported outcome measures,prediction,reconstruction,regression,rupture,medicine(all) ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700
Faculty \ School:
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Epidemiology and Public Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Services and Primary Care
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 15 Dec 2022 03:56
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2023 02:15
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/90099
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i30.10939

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item