Selenium and immune function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental human studies

Filippini, Tommaso, Fairweather-Tait, Susan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1413-5569 and Vinceti, Marco (2022) Selenium and immune function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental human studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. ISSN 0002-9165 (In Press)

[thumbnail of AJCN_manuscript_R2_20Oct2022_final_no_track_changes] PDF (AJCN_manuscript_R2_20Oct2022_final_no_track_changes) - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099.
Available under License Unspecified licence.

Request a copy

Abstract

Background: Selenium is an essential trace element with both beneficial and detrimental effects on health depending on dose and chemical form. Currently, there is debate about recommendations for selenium supplementation as a public health measure to improve immune function and reduce infectious disease susceptibility. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies assessing the effect of selenium supplementation on immunity-related outcomes in healthy people. Methods: We undertook a search of published and unpublished studies in literature databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Clinicaltrials.gov up to October 17, 2022, and performed a meta-analysis comparing the effects on immunity-related outcomes between supplemented versus control arms. Whenever possible we assessed the nonlinear relation using a dose-response approach. Results: Nine trials were included, five in North America, and four in Europe, with duration between 8-48 weeks and supplementation of both inorganic and organic selenium forms. Selenium supplementation did not substantially affect immunoglobulin or white blood cell levels, and the dose-response meta-analysis indicated that an increase in plasma selenium concentrations above 100 µg/L did not further increase IgA levels nor T-cells. An inverted U-shaped relation emerged for Natural killer (NK) cell count, with lower number of these cells both below and above 120 µg/L. The only beneficial effect of selenium supplementation was increased activity for NK lysis, but the available data did not permit dose-response analysis. Cytokine levels were substantially unaffected by selenium supplementation. Conclusions: Although some of the data suggested beneficial effects of selenium supplementation on immune function, the overall picture appears to be inconsistent and heterogenous due to differences in trial duration and interventions, plus evidence of null and even detrimental effects. Overall, the evidence that we extracted from the literature in this systematic review does not support the need to supplement selenium beyond the recommended dietary intake to obtain beneficial effects on immune function.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: selenium, immune function, infectious disease, experimental studies, systematic review, dose-response meta-analysis,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 07 Nov 2022 09:30
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2022 09:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/89672
DOI:

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item