“The datasets do not agree”: Negation in research abstracts

Jiang, Feng Kevin and Hyland, Ken (2022) “The datasets do not agree”: Negation in research abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 68. pp. 60-72. ISSN 0889-4906

[img] PDF (negation_in_research_abstracts_R3) - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 6 July 2024.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Request a copy

Abstract

Few academic genres have received more attention than the research abstract. Its increasing importance, diverse functions and convenient length mean it has been dismembered and dissected by analysts in countless articles. This is a key genre, central to researchers’ reading decisions and therefore to the creation of new knowledge, and as a result writers use a variety of interactive resources to attract readers to the accompanying article. Despite this interest, however, negation has largely escaped EAP scrutiny. This study, therefore, seeks to correct this oversight by examining negation in research abstracts and the extent it contributes to rhetorical persuasion. Drawing on a diachronic corpus of research abstracts, we show how negation contributes to an interpersonal model of academic writing and describe the forms, functions and distribution of negation across time and disciplines. The results not only add to our knowledge of the rhetorical functions of negation but also raise important pedagogical implication for English for Academic Purposes.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Education and Lifelong Learning
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 22 Jun 2022 10:30
Last Modified: 09 Jul 2022 00:17
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/85742
DOI: 10.1016/j.esp.2022.06.003

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item