‘If I would stay alive, I would be their voice’: On the legitimacy of international People’s Tribunals

Zammit Borda, Aldo and Mandelbaum, Stefan (2023) ‘If I would stay alive, I would be their voice’: On the legitimacy of international People’s Tribunals. Modern Law Review, 86 (1). pp. 67-84. ISSN 0026-7961

[thumbnail of ZammitBorda_2022_ModernLawReview]
PDF (ZammitBorda_2022_ModernLawReview) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (200kB) | Preview


In recent years there has been a proliferation of People’s Tribunals (PTs), promising to address atrocities that have fallen through the net of a statist international legal order. However, the status of such informal tribunals has remained controversial in both literature and practice. The dominant view has been that PTs simply lack legitimate authority. Positing that, in the language game of legitimacy, PTs are put on a perpetual argumentative backfoot, this article examines aspects of their input, process and output legitimacy. It is argued that the right of victims-survivors to be heard reigns supreme and it is in upholding that right that the authority of PTs is legitimised. In the current state of international justice, PTs constitute indispensable, quasi-judicial institutions that bridge gaps in access to justice, challenge official narratives (or silences) about atrocities and, potentially, open up new avenues towards justice and recognition.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: people’s tribunals,legitimacy,access to justice,legal pluralism,gross human rights abuses,4* ,/dk/atira/pure/researchoutput/REFrank/4_
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Law
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 09 Apr 2022 00:25
Last Modified: 08 Mar 2024 21:30
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/84533
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2230.12747


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item