Evaluating the results of resistance training using ultrasound or flexed arm circumference: A case for keeping it simple?

Gentil, Paulo, Budzynski-Seymour, Emily ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-4005, Souza, Daniel, Steele, James, Fisher, James P. and Bottaro, Martim (2020) Evaluating the results of resistance training using ultrasound or flexed arm circumference: A case for keeping it simple? Journal of Clinical and Translational Research, 6 (2). ISSN 2424-810X

[thumbnail of Published manuscript]
PDF (Published manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (597kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (448kB) | Preview


Background: The present study aimed to compare changes in muscle size when measured by ultrasound (MT, muscle thickness) and arm circumference (AC) using data from young men.   Methods: The investigation involved data from 3 previous studies involving a total 67 young men who performed resistance training (RT) for 10-12 weeks. Before and after the training period, elbow flexor MT was evaluated by ultrasound and AC was measured. We conducted two-stage individual patient data random effects meta-analyses using both Frequentist and Bayesian hypothesis testing. One-sample analyses examined the absence or presence of change in both MT and AC, and paired analyses examined whether these differed from one another or equivalent.   Results: One-sample analysis supported that both AC (+4.9%; t p = 0.0002; BF10 = 6,255,759,515) and MT (+3.9%; p < 0.0001; BF10 = 7,958,241,773) suggested that change in muscle size had occurred. Frequentist paired comparisons suggested that the estimates of change between both AC and MT measures did not significantly differ (p = 0.1092) but where not statistically equivalent. Bayesian paired comparisons however suggested that MT estimates where greater in magnitude than AC estimates for change in muscle size (BF10 = 16.39174).   Conclusion: Both MT and AC are able to detect RT induced changes in muscle size of the upper arm, but that the magnitude of changes may differ. Thus, care should be taken when comparing or combining estimates using either approach. Relevance for patients: The use of AC might be considered as a practical and low-cost alternative to detect changes in muscle size.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2022 11:30
Last Modified: 07 Oct 2023 01:12
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/83374
DOI: 10.18053/jctres.06.202002.004


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item