Astronomers’ representations of the earth and day/night cycle: Implications for children’s acquisition of scientific concepts

Nobes, Gavin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1991-1130, Frède, Valérie and Panagiotaki, Georgia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2975-1196 (2022) Astronomers’ representations of the earth and day/night cycle: Implications for children’s acquisition of scientific concepts. Current Psychology. ISSN 1046-1310

[thumbnail of 2022 CUP Nobes, Frede & Panagiotaki]
Preview
PDF (2022 CUP Nobes, Frede & Panagiotaki) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Previous researchers (e.g., Vosniadou and Brewer, Cognitive Psychology 24:535–585, 1992) have claimed that children have naïve, but coherent, mental models of the earth, such as the flat earth and the hollow sphere. Recent studies have challenged this view, focusing on the original researchers’ methods of testing (drawing and open questions) and coding. In this study we tested the construct validity of these methods by asking expert astronomers to complete the same test originally used with 5-year-olds. Many astronomers gave responses that, if given by young children, would have been considered non-scientific and as evidence of naïve mental models. Many gave two or more seemingly contradictory answers to the same questions and, even when only their ‘most scientific’ responses were considered, fewer than 50% of these expert scientists were classified as having coherent scientific mental models. Comparison with children’s responses to a rephrased and disambiguated task indicated that even 6–7-year-olds gave more scientific answers. The astronomers’ comments revealed the main reasons why the original task lacks validity: they found many questions confusing and ambiguous. This may well explain many children’s responses, too. Since the task incorrectly indicates that experts in the field have fundamental misconceptions, it is likely also to have led to substantial underestimates of children’s scientific understanding.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: astronomy,scientific expertise,earth,children's mental models,conceptual development,children’s mental models,psychology(all) ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3200
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Psychology
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 04 Jan 2022 08:30
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2022 03:27
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/82846
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02676-6

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item