From scientific arguments to scepticism: Humans’ place in the Greenhouse

Augé, Anaïs (2022) From scientific arguments to scepticism: Humans’ place in the Greenhouse. Public Understanding of Science, 31 (2). pp. 179-194. ISSN 0963-6625

[thumbnail of Published_Version]
PDF (Published_Version) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (130kB) | Preview


This article investigates the different roles attributed to humanity in the climate change debate, through the depiction of the greenhouse effect. Our hypothesis is that the stance associated with different genres will not only demonstrate different conceptualisations of the greenhouse effect but also convey different views on humans’ capacity (or lack of capacity) to mitigate climate change. The corpus under study is composed of texts pertaining to three genres which display particular viewpoints: scientific papers present a documented view on the phenomenon, online forum discussions present exchanges between users who endorse or question particular characteristics of the Greenhouse, and sceptical newspaper articles explicitly deny the existence of an anthropogenic phenomenon. Through a corpus-based, cognitive and pragmatic analysis of the metaphorical expression greenhouse effect, the research shows that humans’ place(s) in the Greenhouse is a significant part of environmental argumentative strategies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: greenhouse effect,media,online forum,scepticism,science,communication,developmental and educational psychology,arts and humanities (miscellaneous),sdg 13 - climate action ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3315
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 16 Sep 2021 11:16
Last Modified: 20 Apr 2023 22:35
DOI: 10.1177/09636625211035624

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item