Tools
Tools
Snelson, Tim 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-2432 and Macauley, William
(2020)
The influence of ‘psychiatrist friends’ on British film censorship in the 1960s.
Journal of British Cinema and Television, 17 (4).
pp. 473-500.
ISSN 1743-4521
Preview |
PDF (Publsihed_Version)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (158kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article will demonstrate the significant influence that psychiatric consultants exerted on the policy of the British Board of Film Censors (BBFC) and, as a result, on cinematic representations of mental illness and psychiatric practices during what Arthur Marwick (2005) called the 'long 1960s'. Drawing upon extensive research at the British Board of Film Classification archives, this article complicates dominant narratives of British censorship in highlighting how John Trevelyan, appointed as Secretary of the BBFC in 1958 and frequently depicted as a liberalising force, deferred to psychiatric expertise outside the BBFC in making decisions about film censorship and certification and, in some instances, scriptwriting and editing. This article will explain how a proliferation of American and, later, British films dealing with mental illness caused BBFC examiners to lose confidence in their ability to make censorship decisions in the mid-1960s. Initially, this loss of confidence prompted consultation with the influential British mental health organisation, the National Association for Mental Health (NAMH) and, subsequently, a small group of trusted medical professionals, referred to as 'psychiatrist friends', who decided on cuts and certification of films including The Caretakers (1963), The Collector (1965) and Repulsion (1965). As a result, the BBFC moved from a default position of prohibition to one of enabling 'serious' films that promoted mental health awareness and discussion of contemporary mental health issues. This article aims to offer new insights into the policies, processes and practices of the BBFC, to contextualise censorship within historical debates about mental health representation and to highlight the mutually productive interactions that took place between the fields of mental health and cinema.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bbfc,censorship,mental health,psychiatry,antipsychiatry,1960s,the caretakers,repulsion,anti-psychiatry,mental health,censorship,national association of mental health (namh),the collector,psychiatry,trevelyan,communication,visual arts and performing arts,sdg 3 - good health and well-being ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3300/3315 |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Art, Media and American Studies |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Film, Television and Media Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > East Anglian Film Archive |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | LivePure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2020 23:52 |
| Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2023 02:52 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/77389 |
| DOI: | 10.3366/jbctv.2020.0543 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |