How to vindicate the armchair

Andow, James ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5760-0475 (2022) How to vindicate the armchair. Analysis, 82 (2). 306–321. ISSN 0003-2638

Preview

PDF (preprint) - Accepted Version Available under License Unspecified licence. Download (231kB) | Preview

Abstract

Strevens’s Thinking Off Your Feet promises to vindicate philosophical analysis. My comments take a narrow, critical focus. I argue that Strevens doesn’t deliver on this promise. Given my understanding of (i) what is required from a vindication of philosophical analysis and (ii) Strevens’s grounds for ‘optimism’ about philosophical analysis, Strevens hasn’t done enough to vindicate philosophical analysis. Indeed, Strevens’s supposed grounds for optimism about armchair philosophy in fact provide motivation for philosophical analysis to give up some ground to experimental philosophy. Although my comments are critical, my overall view of the book is not. Strevens does important and interesting work presenting and analysing various models of how armchair philosophy might work and what it might achieve. The book deserves a central place in future discussions about these issues.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Published online: 05 July 2022
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies University of East Anglia Research Groups/Centres > Theme - ClimateUEA
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Philosophy Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > UEA Experimental Philosophy Group
Depositing User:	LivePure Connector
Date Deposited:	28 Aug 2020 23:58
Last Modified:	21 Jul 2023 09:55
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/76712
DOI:	10.1093/analys/anaa061

Actions (login required)

View Item