The Tyrant’s Vein: Misrule and Popularity in the Elizabethan Playhouse

Womack, Peter (2020) The Tyrant’s Vein: Misrule and Popularity in the Elizabethan Playhouse. Review of English Studies. ISSN 0034-6551

[img] PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 24 March 2022.

Download (1MB) | Request a copy
[img] PDF (Submitted_Manuscript) - Draft Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099.

Download (871kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The fashion for tyrants on the Elizabethan stage reflected a sort of affinity between tyranny and theatre. How did the two things fit together? A tyrant is not a true king, but only seems to be one, and so is like an actor playing a king. Because he has no right to the throne, he must assert his rule by personal and rhetorical force – the actor’s resources. Moreover, a tyrant is understood to be a figure in whom appetite conquers reason, self-control gives way to desire – as happens (according to hostile accounts) in the theatre. This logic applies particularly to popular theatre, where the tyrant is sustained by his dynamic relationship with the audience. In comparison with the tyrants of academic or humanist drama, who are uneasy and isolated, the tyrant on the common stage is energetic and happy amid the crowd. He is the imagined monarch of the theatre’s populace – their representative, their creature, affiliated to them not by political forms but by the symbolic repertoire of festivity: misrule, inversion, masquerade. In this way, people without rights recognise themselves in the unrighteous ruler: arguably, that is how tyranny works in reality.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 14 Aug 2020 23:48
Last Modified: 16 Aug 2020 23:45
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/76443
DOI: 10.1093/res/hgaa006

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item