Online Information on Electronic Cigarettes:Comparative Study of Relevant Websites From Baidu and Google Search Engines

Chen, Ting, Gentry, Sarah, Qiu, Dechao, Deng, Yan, Notley, Caitlin, Cheng, Guangwen and Song, Fujian (2020) Online Information on Electronic Cigarettes:Comparative Study of Relevant Websites From Baidu and Google Search Engines. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (1). ISSN 1439-4456

[img] PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 31 December 2099.

Download (680kB) | Request a copy
[img]
Preview
PDF (Chen et al 2020- Online information on e-cigarettes-JMIR) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (83kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online information on electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) may influence people's perception and use of e-cigarettes. Websites with information on e-cigarettes in the Chinese language have not been systematically assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare the types and credibility of Web-based information on e-cigarettes identified from Google (in English) and Baidu (in Chinese) search engines. METHODS: We used the keywords vaping or e-cigarettes to conduct a search on Google and the equivalent Chinese characters for Baidu. The first 50 unique and relevant websites from each of the two search engines were included in this analysis. The main characteristics of the websites, credibility of the websites, and claims made on the included websites were systematically assessed and compared. RESULTS: Compared with websites on Google, more websites on Baidu were owned by manufacturers or retailers (15/50, 30% vs 33/50, 66%; P<.001). None of the Baidu websites, compared to 24% (12/50) of Google websites, were provided by public or health professional institutions. The Baidu websites were more likely to contain e-cigarette advertising (P<.001) and less likely to provide information on health education (P<.001). The overall credibility of the included Baidu websites was lower than that of the Google websites (P<.001). An age restriction warning was shown on all advertising websites from Google (15/15) but only on 10 of the 33 (30%) advertising websites from Baidu (P<.001). Conflicting or unclear health and social claims were common on the included websites. CONCLUSIONS: Although conflicting or unclear claims on e-cigarettes were common on websites from both Baidu and Google search engines, there was a lack of online information from public health authorities in China. Unbiased information and evidence-based recommendations on e-cigarettes should be provided by public health authorities to help the public make informed decisions regarding the use of e-cigarettes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: ©Ting Chen, Sarah Gentry, Dechao Qiu, Yan Deng, Caitlin Notley, Guangwen Cheng, Fujian Song. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.01.2020.
Uncontrolled Keywords: electronic cigarette,electronic nicotine delivery system,internet-based information,online health information,health informatics ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700/2718
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 03 Jan 2020 04:00
Last Modified: 31 Jul 2020 23:48
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/73445
DOI: 10.2196/14725

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item