Competing institutional logics of information sharing in public services: Why we often seem to be talking at cross-purposes when we talk about information sharing

Tools

Cornford, James (2019) Competing institutional logics of information sharing in public services: Why we often seem to be talking at cross-purposes when we talk about information sharing. Public Money & Management, 39 (5). pp. 336-345. ISSN 0954-0962

[thumbnail of Accepted_Manuscript]
Preview
 PDF (Accepted_Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (810kB) | Preview

Abstract

Sharing information and data across organizational boundaries has proved hard to achieve. This is, in part, because we have framed the problem, and possible solutions, in one of three conflicting ways that draw on powerful institutional logics: design, governance and enculturation. Five strategies for addressing this conflict are presented—contingency, combination, conflict, ambiguity and synthesis. The conclusion links the problem of information sharing to the paradoxical nature of information.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: information governance,; information sharing;,institutional logics;,paradox of organizing
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > Norwich Business School
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2019 08:30
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2022 04:47
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/71244
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1611236

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item