‘If —’ not: poetry in use

Womack, Peter ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-1902 (2019) ‘If —’ not: poetry in use. Critical Quarterly, 61 (2). pp. 41-55. ISSN 0011-1562

[thumbnail of Accepted_manuscript]
PDF (Accepted_manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (742kB) | Preview


When students at Manchester University erased a famous poem by Rudyard Kipling and substituted an almost equally famous one by Maya Angelou, what did their action signify? They stated publicly that it was about colonialism. This critical account confirms their reading, but situates it among a set of supplementary oppositions: ease and difficulty, childhood and maturity, power and subordination. It argues that the readily available positions in the argument – literary value, anti-racist principle – are too rigid to do justice to the historical complexity of the dialogue which the action set up. What gives us access to the opposing ideologies, not as inert orthodoxies but as lived cultures, is the poetry in use.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Literature, Drama and Creative Writing
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Medieval and Early Modern Research Group
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 27 Feb 2019 10:30
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2022 04:21
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/70022
DOI: 10.1111/criq.12474


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item