When and how to update systematic reviews:Consensus and checklist

Garner, Paul, Hopewell, Sally, Chandler, Jackie, MacLehose, Harriet, Akl, Elie A., Beyene, Joseph, Chang, Stephanie, Churchill, Rachel, Dearness, Karin, Guyatt, Gordon, Lefebvre, Carol, Liles, Beth, Marshall, Rachel, Martínez García, Laura, Mavergames, Chris, Nasser, Mona, Qaseem, Amir, Sampson, Margaret, Soares-Weiser, Karla, Takwoingi, Yemisi, Thabane, Lehana, Trivella, Marialena, Tugwell, Peter, Welsh, Emma, Wilson, Ed C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8369-1577 and Schünemann, Holger J. (2016) When and how to update systematic reviews:Consensus and checklist. BMJ (Online), 354. ISSN 0959-8146

[thumbnail of Published manuscript]
PDF (Published manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (318kB) | Preview


Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: medicine(all) ,/dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2700
Related URLs:
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 12 Nov 2018 11:31
Last Modified: 21 Oct 2022 20:33
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/68834
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3507

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item