Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)—Iron Review

Lynch, Sean, Pfeiffer, Christine, Georgieff, Michael, Brittenham, Gary, Fairweather-Tait, Susan, Hurrell, Richard F, McArdle, Harry J. and Raiten, Daniel (2018) Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND)—Iron Review. The Journal of Nutrition, 148 (Issue suppl_1). 1001S–1067S. ISSN 0022-3166

[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

This is the fifth in the series of reviews developed as part of the Biomarkers of Nutrition for Development (BOND) program. The BOND Iron Expert Panel (I-EP) reviewed the extant knowledge regarding iron biology, public health implications, and the relative usefulness of currently available biomarkers of iron status from deficiency to overload. Approaches to assessing intake, including bioavailability, are also covered. The report also covers technical and laboratory considerations for the use of available biomarkers of iron status, and concludes with a description of research priorities along with a brief discussion of new biomarkers with potential for use across the spectrum of activities related to the study of iron in human health. The I-EP concluded that current iron biomarkers are reliable for accurately assessing many aspects of iron nutrition. However, a clear distinction is made between the relative strengths of biomarkers to assess hematological consequences of iron deficiency versus other putative functional outcomes, particularly the relationship between maternal and fetal iron status during pregnancy, birth outcomes, and infant cognitive, motor and emotional development. The I-EP also highlighted the importance of considering the confounding effects of inflammation and infection on the interpretation of iron biomarker results, as well as the impact of life stage. Finally, alternative approaches to the evaluation of the risk for nutritional iron overload at the population level are presented, because the currently designated upper limits for the biomarker generally employed (serum ferritin) may not differentiate between true iron overload and the effects of subclinical inflammation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: iron,iron nutrition,iron status assessment,iron biology,iron biomarkers
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Depositing User: LivePure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Jul 2018 12:30
Last Modified: 02 Aug 2020 23:44
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/67834
DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxx036

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item