Openness and stability

Cottey, Alan (2016) Openness and stability. AI & Society, 31 (3). pp. 319-325. ISSN 0951-5666

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)


Humanity’s desire for change but not instability is explored. In this context, it is proposed that a key ‘balancing aid’ of society is openness. Converse attributes, such as secrecy, reserve and tact, are also discussed, following the ideas of Sissela Bok. A particular interest in openness can be traced to the thought and advocacy of Niels Bohr, at the beginning of the nuclear age, when the problems were thought about mainly in terms of security. His ideas and efforts to promote an open world are reviewed in the light of subsequent developments. These developments are not restricted to nuclear matters. The qualitative proliferation of kinds of instability (perhaps combining into John Beddington’s ‘perfect storm’) is relevant. This proliferation justifies extension of Bohr’s concerns with security to the wider realm of stability. It is also proposed in this paper that Bohr’s use of the term confidence, which was an important element of his argument for an open world, requires refinement, with a distinction between confidence in others (trust) and self-confidence (necessary for openness). The paper ends with a section on ‘improving our prospects’.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: openness,stability,niels bohr,sissela bok,self-confidence,trust
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Science > School of Chemistry
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 04 Apr 2018 14:33
Last Modified: 22 Oct 2022 03:40
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-015-0592-9

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item