Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance

Hyland, Ken and Jiang, Feng (Kevin) (2016) Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33 (3). pp. 251-274. ISSN 0741-0883

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (372kB) | Preview


Successful research writers construct texts by taking a novel point of view toward the issues they discuss while anticipating readers’ imagined reactions to those views. This intersubjective positioning is encompassed by the term stance and, in various guises, has been a topic of interest to researchers of written communication and applied linguists for the past three decades. Recognizing that academic writing is less objective and “author evacuated” than Geertz and others once supposed, analysts have sought to identify the ways that writers use language to acknowledge and construct social relations as they negotiate agreement of their interpretations of data with readers. Despite prolonged and widespread curiosity concerning the notion of stance, however, together with an interest in the gradual evolution of research genres more generally, very little is known of how it has changed in recent years and whether such changes have occurred uniformly across disciplines. In this article we set out to explore these issues. Drawing on a corpus of 2.2 million words taken from the top five journals in each of four disciplines at three distinct time periods, we seek to determine whether authorial projection has changed in academic writing over the past 50 years.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: academic writing,disciplinary differences,stance,diachronic change
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Education and Lifelong Learning
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 12 Jan 2018 12:30
Last Modified: 21 Oct 2022 17:33
DOI: 10.1177/0741088316650399


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item