Closing the loop on student feedback: the case of Australian and Scottish universities

Shah, Mahsood, Cheng, Ming and Fitzgerald, Robert (2017) Closing the loop on student feedback: the case of Australian and Scottish universities. Higher Education, 74 (1). 115–129. ISSN 0018-1560

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (178kB) | Preview

Abstract

Universities have a long history of collecting student feedback using surveys and other mechanisms. The last decade has witnessed a significant shift in how student feedback is systematically collected, analysed, reported, and used by governments and institutions. This shift is due to a number of factors, including changes in government policy related to quality assurance, and the increased use of the results by various stakeholders such as governments, institutions, and potential students and employers. The collection, analysis, and reporting of results are systematically carried out in many institutions worldwide. However, how to use student feedback to effectively improve student learning experience remains an issue to be addressed. This paper will contribute to this debate by comparing how Australian and Scottish universities use student feedback results to inform improvements. Based on thematic analysis of external quality audit reports of all Australian and Scottish universities, this paper suggests that universities have systematic processes to collect student feedback using a range of mechanisms, but limited work is done to use the data to inform improvements. This paper argues the need for universities to genuinely listen to student voice by facilitating partnership between students and institutions to act on their feedback as part of quality assurance.

Item Type: Article
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Social Sciences > School of Education and Lifelong Learning
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2017 06:06
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2022 00:08
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/65635
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0032-x

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item