Lipoprotein‐Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity Is a Marker of Risk But Not a Useful Target for Treatment in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease

Wallentin, Lars, Held, Claes, Armstrong, Paul W., Cannon, Christopher P., Davies, Richard Y., Granger, Christopher B., Hagström, Emil, Harrington, Robert A., Hochman, Judith S., Koenig, Wolfgang, Krug‐Gourley, Sue, Mohler, Emile R., Siegbahn, Agneta, Tarka, Elizabeth, Steg, Philippe Gabriel, Stewart, Ralph A. H., Weiss, Robert, Östlund, Ollie, White, Harvey D. and Flather, Marcus (2016) Lipoprotein‐Associated Phospholipase A2 Activity Is a Marker of Risk But Not a Useful Target for Treatment in Patients With Stable Coronary Heart Disease. Journal of the American Heart Association, 5 (6). ISSN 2047-9980

[img]
Preview
PDF (Published manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: We evaluated lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2 (Lp‐PLA2) activity in patients with stable coronary heart disease before and during treatment with darapladib, a selective Lp‐PLA2 inhibitor, in relation to outcomes and the effects of darapladib in the STABILITY trial. Methods and Results: Plasma Lp‐PLA2 activity was determined at baseline (n=14 500); at 1 month (n=13 709); serially (n=100) at 3, 6, and 18 months; and at the end of treatment. Adjusted Cox regression models evaluated associations between Lp‐PLA2 activity levels and outcomes. At baseline, the median Lp‐PLA2 level was 172.4 μmol/min per liter (interquartile range 143.1–204.2 μmol/min per liter). Comparing the highest and lowest Lp‐PLA2 quartile groups, the hazard ratios were 1.50 (95% CI 1.23–1.82) for the primary composite end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke), 1.95 (95% CI 1.29–2.93) for hospitalization for heart failure, 1.42 (1.07–1.89) for cardiovascular death, and 1.37 (1.03–1.81) for myocardial infarction after adjustment for baseline characteristics, standard laboratory variables, and other prognostic biomarkers. Treatment with darapladib led to a ≈65% persistent reduction in median Lp‐PLA2 activity. There were no associations between on‐treatment Lp‐PLA2 activity or changes of Lp‐PLA2 activity and outcomes, and there were no significant interactions between baseline and on‐treatment Lp‐PLA2 activity or changes in Lp‐PLA2 activity levels and the effects of darapladib on outcomes. Conclusions: Although high Lp‐PLA2 activity was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, pharmacological lowering of Lp‐PLA2 activity by ≈65% did not significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary heart disease, regardless of the baseline level or the magnitude of change of Lp‐PLA2 activity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: atherosclerosis,coronary disease,inflammation,lipoprotein,myocardial infarction
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2017 05:06
Last Modified: 22 Apr 2020 04:52
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63754
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003407

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item