Tools
ToolsArnold, Dana (2017) Misprisions of London. Art History, 40 (4). 770–783. ISSN 0141-6790
Preview |
PDF (Accepted manuscript)
- Accepted Version
Download (335kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Early nineteenth-century London is often seen as the architecturally poor cousin of other European cities. The backward glance of the historian presents a story of unrealized urban visions and abandoned grand projects rather than focusing on what was actually achieved and built. Contemporaries viewed things differently; London was ‘the new Rome’, the first city of a new Empire, and the new classical architecture and urban planning made reference to its ancient counterpart. The nostalgia for a temporally distant Rome was predicated on the invented memory of its architectural splendours. But ancient Rome was in ruins. For London to equal the status of Rome would it too need to become a ruin? Did its future lie in fragments?
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Part of the special issue "Art History at 40: Image and Memory" |
| Faculty \ School: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > School of Art, Media and American Studies |
| UEA Research Groups: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Research Groups > Art History and World Art Studies |
| Depositing User: | Pure Connector |
| Date Deposited: | 07 Apr 2017 05:12 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Jul 2023 09:58 |
| URI: | https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/63208 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/1467-8365.12336 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |