Judgements about deprivation of liberty made by various professionals: comparison study

Cairns, Ruth, Brown, Penelope, Grant-Peterkin, Hugh, Khondoker, Mizanur R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-1635, Owen, Gareth S., Richardson, Genevra, Szmukler, George and Hotopf, Matthew (2011) Judgements about deprivation of liberty made by various professionals: comparison study. The Psychiatrist, 35 (9). ISSN 1758-3209

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Aims and method A group of lawyers, psychiatrists, best interest assessors and independent mental capacity advocates were asked to make binary judgements about whether real-life situations in 12 vignettes amounted to deprivation of liberty. Kappa coefficients were calculated to describe the level of agreement within each professional group and for the total group of professionals. Results There was total agreement between all professionals about deprivation of liberty in only 1 of the 12 cases. The overall level of agreement for judgements made by all professionals was ‘slight’ (κ=0.16, P<0.01). Clinical implications There are practical difficulties involved in making reliable deprivation of liberty judgements within the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) legislation. A clear interpretation of deprivation of liberty is necessary to facilitate professionals’ decision-making in this area.

Item Type:	Article
Faculty \ School:	Faculty of Science > School of Environmental Sciences Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups:	Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Epidemiology and Public Health Faculty of Science > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Epidemiology Centre
Depositing User:	Pure Connector
Date Deposited:	24 Sep 2016 00:40
Last Modified:	20 Apr 2023 00:12
URI:	https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/60171
DOI:	10.1192/pb.bp.110.033241

Actions (login required)

View Item