The effect of a brief action planning intervention on adherence to double-blind study medication, compared to a standard trial protocol, in the Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD) clinical trial: a cluster randomised sub-study

Farmer, Andrew J., Oke, Jason, Hardeman, Wendy, Tucker, Lynne, Sutton, Stephen, Kinmonth, Ann Louise, Griffin, Simon and Holman, Rury R. (2016) The effect of a brief action planning intervention on adherence to double-blind study medication, compared to a standard trial protocol, in the Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD) clinical trial: a cluster randomised sub-study. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 120. 56–64. ISSN 0168-8227

[img]
Preview
PDF (Accepted manuscript) - Submitted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Aims: Clinical trial patients are highly motivated but may encounter difficulty in taking study medication regularly when treatment burden is substantial. We assessed a brief behavioural intervention, given in addition to a standard trial protocol. Methods: We performed a two-arm adherence sub-study within a twelve-month randomised controlled drug trial evaluating the impact of statin and/or omega-3 EE90 treatment in 800 patients with type 2 diabetes. Fifty-nine United Kingdom general practices were cluster-randomised to action-planning or control groups. The former delivered an initial written exercise prompting participants to formulate action-plans to take study medication regularly, with brief nurse encouragement to use action-plans at later visits, whilst the latter followed the standard trial protocol. The primary outcome was proportion of days on which study medication were taken as intended measured by electronic medication containers. Results: Adjusted mean (95% CI) proportion of days with medication taken as intended was 79.3% (76.3% to 82.3%) for the 30 action-planning practices (321 participants), compared with 78.5% (75.8% to 81.1%) for 27 control group practices (426 participants, with a mean intervention effect of 0.9%, 95%CI -3.1% to +4.9%, p=0.67). Adjusted odds ratios for ⩾80% trial medication adherence for action-planning compared with control practices were 1.29 (0.90 to 1.84) and 1.38 (0.96 to 1.99) respectively. Conclusions: Low-intensity action-planning interventions used alone are unlikely to have a clinically important impact on medication adherence, particularly in a clinical trial setting. These findings, do not exclude their contribution, as part of a multifactorial intervention, to improving treatment adherence. ISRCTN number 76737502.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: type 2 diabetes,statin,omega-3 ee90,adherence,behavioural intervention,motivation,action planning,treatment burden,adults
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 24 Sep 2016 00:13
Last Modified: 10 Nov 2020 00:52
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59926
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.07.004

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item