Selection and visualisation of outcome measures for complex post-acute acquired brain injury rehabilitation interventions

Ford, Catherine Elaine Longworth, Malley, Donna, Bateman, Andrew, Clare, Isabel C H, Wagner, Adam P ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9101-3477 and Gracey, Fergus ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1416-7894 (2016) Selection and visualisation of outcome measures for complex post-acute acquired brain injury rehabilitation interventions. NeuroRehabilitation, 39 (1). pp. 65-79. ISSN 1053-8135

[thumbnail of Manuscript]
Preview
PDF (Manuscript) - Accepted Version
Download (552kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement challenges rehabilitation services to select tools that promote stakeholder engagement in measuring complex interventions. OBJECTIVES: To examine the suitability of outcome measures for complex postacute acquired brain injury (ABI) rehabilitation interventions, report outcomes of a holistic, neuropsychological ABI rehabilitation program and propose a simple way of visualizing complex outcomes. METHODS: Patient/carer reported outcome measures (PROMS), experience measures (PREMS) and staff-rated measures were collected for consecutive admissions over 1 year to an 18-week holistic, neuropsychological rehabilitation programme at baseline, 18 weeks and 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Engagement with outcome measurement was poorest for carers and at follow-up for all stakeholders. Dependence, abilities, adjustment, unmet needs, symptomatology including executive dysfunction, and self-reassurance showed improvements at 18 weeks. Adjustment, social participation, perceived health, symptomatology including dysexecutive difficulties, and anxiety were worse at baseline for those who did not complete rehabilitation, than those who did. A radar plot facilitated outcome visualization. CONCLUSIONS: Engagement with outcome measurement was best when time and support were provided. Supplementing patient- with staff-rated and attendance measures may explain missing data and help quantify healthcare needs. The MPAI4, EBIQ and DEX-R appeared suitable measures to evaluate outcomes and distinguish those completing and not completing neuropsychological rehabilitation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: brain injuries,health services research,stroke,outcome and process assessment (health care),neuropsychology,rehabilitation
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Norwich Medical School
UEA Research Groups: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Health Economics
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Public Health and Health Services Research (former - to 2023)
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Population Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Centres > Lifespan Health
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > Research Groups > Norwich Clinical Trials Unit
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2016 14:00
Last Modified: 11 Jan 2024 01:29
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59328
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-161339

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item