The PiTSTOP study:a feasibility cluster randomized trial of delirium prevention in care homes for older people

Siddiqi, Najma, Cheater, Francine, Collinson, Michelle, Farrin, Amanda, Forster, Anne, George, Deepa, Godfrey, Mary, Graham, Elizabeth, Harrison, Jennifer, Heaven, Anne, Heudtlass, Peter, Hulme, Claire, Meads, David, North, Chris, Sturrock, Angus and Young, John (2016) The PiTSTOP study:a feasibility cluster randomized trial of delirium prevention in care homes for older people. Age and Ageing, 45 (5). pp. 652-661. ISSN 0002-0729

[img]
Preview
PDF (Manuscript) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (461kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background and objectives: delirium is a distressing but potentially preventable condition common in older people in long-term care. It is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, functional decline, hospitalization and significant healthcare costs. Multicomponent interventions, addressing delirium risk factors, have been shown to reduce delirium by one-third in hospitals. It is not known whether this approach is also effective in long-term care. In previous work, we designed a bespoke delirium prevention intervention, called ‘Stop Delirium!’ In preparation for a definitive trial of Stop Delirium, we sought to address key aspects of trial design for the particular circumstances of care homes.  Design: a cluster randomized feasibility study with an embedded process evaluation.  Setting and participants: residents of 14 care homes for older people in one metropolitan district in the UK.  Intervention: Stop Delirium!: a 16-month-enhanced educational package to support care home staff to address key delirium risk factors. Control homes received usual care.  Measurements: we collected data to determine the following: recruitment and attrition; delirium rates and variability between homes; feasibility of measuring delirium, resource use, quality of life, hospital admissions and falls; and intervention implementation and adherence.  Results: two-thirds (215) of eligible care home residents were recruited. One-month delirium prevalence was 4.0% in intervention and 7.1% in control homes. Proposed outcome measurements were feasible, although our approach appeared to underestimate delirium. Health economic evaluation was feasible using routinely collected data.  Conclusion: a definitive trial of delirium prevention in long-term care is needed but will require some further design modifications and pilot work.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Uncontrolled Keywords: delirium,long-term care,prevention,cluster randomized trial,older people
Faculty \ School: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences > School of Health Sciences
Depositing User: Pure Connector
Date Deposited: 31 May 2016 16:00
Last Modified: 22 Jul 2020 00:54
URI: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59153
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afw091

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item